|
NASFA
Home l Contact NASFA
California Judge Rules
State Farm Agencies Are Not Franchises
On April 14, 2008, the
Superior Court of California, San Joaquin County issued
its ruling on the pending Motions for Summary Judgment
in the Vice v. State Farm lawsuit. The decision
was not favorable to NASFA.
Click
here to read the full ruling
NASFA Supports Franchise
Suit in California
NASFA supported suit in the Superior Court of
California County of San Joaquin to determine whether the
independent contractor agencies owned by State Farm
agents should be subject to California franchise laws.
Had the suit been successful, it could have had far-reaching,
positive effects for agents.
Click here to
download a copy of the complaint
Statement of Undisputed Material Facts in Support of
Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment
Memorandum of State Farm Defendants in Support of Motion
for Summary Judgment
Declaration
of Thomas M. Conley in Support of Defendants' Motion for
Summary Judgment
Memorandum of Points and
Authorities in Support of Plaintiff Roger Vice's Motion
for Summary Judgment
Declaration of Roger
Vice in Support of Plaintiff's Motion for Summary
Judgment
Plaintiff's Separate Statement of Undisputed Material
Facts in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment
Memorandum in Support of the Motion of Roger Vice for
Summary Judgment
Memorandum
of State Farm Defendants in Opposition to Plaintiff's
Motion for Summary Judgment |
